senang aje, google alpha, banyak pro guna alpha’s dah…

actually, doesnt matter what system u use, just love what u have. if u were to buy new camera… all the review will say:

nikon will say they have best lenses…(or they are the most expensive gear)
canon will tell u thier’s best iso (and any lens made before 1987 cant be use on new bodies, L lens are more expensive then CZ’s)
sony will say thier accessories are cheapest (yes it’s true to nikon and canon, and their AF CZ)
pentax will tell u their speed (or how they become a minor in the industry, slowly dying out)
olympus will say four third are the REAL format (while they say FF is rubbish, and APS-C is old school… sigh… kiddos)
hasselbald will laugh at the toys the above company is making, they tell u hasselbald is the REAL camera. (why nasa actually chosen hasselbald+carlzeiss for space photography)

why not try fujifilm? they have the most accurate color in photo… (but they are also the slowest body)

or kodak, or holga, or vivitar’s or leica?

blaahhh, just use nokia… 5MP, carlzeiss, dual xenon flash…

Camera DSLR bukan bergantung pada technology canggih atau siapa dulu wujud.. IBM pun wujud dulu sebelum apple, tapi kenapa apple maju 10 tahun dari IBM sekarang? DSLR bukan hanya sebab technology, tapi cara awak sendiri ambil gambar dan resultnya..

Technology canggih mana pun tak menjamin apa-apa..kami pengguna nikon and canon percaya pada kepuasan bukan kemajuan semata.. hehe.. liveview untuk orang baru nak belajar ok lah.. tapi kalau dah lebih berjinak dalam dunia DSLR ni.. liveview tu tak pandang pun.. bukan nak berlagak.. tapi komen awak terlalu berat sebelah.. yup.. kita sokong apa kita pakai.. tapi.. kena cermin jugak diri..

Sony bagus.. macam penulis asal tu kata.. lagi 5-10 tahun akan dominasi 40-50% market DSLR dengan kemampuan 5-10 tu.. then nikon n canon still kat level tu jugak ke? saya rasa akan masih maju 10-20 tahun jugak. Hehe.. try comparekan sendiri.. jangan marah ye.. saya tak anti sony.. cuma rasa x best pulak entry n sangat berat sebelah..

kalau tak bagus, kenapa semua pro guna nikon + canon ye tak?

salam aman dr sy..

owh.. n hey.. found u on lowyat forum bout the tun**ehem2
tried to pm u on ym in case that i might be able to help a bit

im really sorry.. i am not camera enthusiast but i do mingle and lots of my friend are indeed professional photographer and some of them photograph for hobby purposes.

in this clash of the titans.. actually what we can say its.. how they used the technology and what best suits u.. if u bought a camera with thousand of features.. but you are young and new in this camera thingy.. it will not bring any difference.. study more.. learn more.. experience more.. then compare.. then only you will know which one best suits u.. its not in the matter of using the hightest and latest technology to get the best shot.. all you need is right time, right moment, right place with the right tools..

then you must think about your budget.. if u can only afford to buy something which around RM5k.. do talk about something that is in that range only.. dont talk about ferrari when you can only afford civic.. be realistic..

if you comparing about technology.. please.. again.. please.. do not use maxis as your example.. they are good in their business plan.. but sucks in their broadband.. again we r talking about technology here..

you like to use live view? or youre not? its all up to u.. at the end.. the best shot you can take will do the talking for you.. not the camera..

its like when u buy a computer.. will u use core2extreme or u just buy core2quad? well.. up to u.. ive been following this matter for quite some time.. if u really have the money.. please buy 1 high end sony.. 1 high end nikon and 1 high end canon.. then u do the comparison.. i would like to hear from you.. instead of listening to other ppl.. i do agree with some of the reply saying that the comments or review are much indeed bias.. because all mags in Malaysia and overseas get paid to do the review..

thank you..

cheers again..

cheers bro..

Actually dalam hal ini….no winners and losers. Baik sony atau apa ajek brand…terpulang mengikut keselesaan di pengguna tu. Keduanya, budget…kalau dah secupak manakan boleh jadi segantang.

Pun begitu, kenapa saya katakan kepada peminat yang mahu membeli dslr pergi lah survey canon or nikon…dan pada alasan yang sama mereka berdua ni adalah pioneer dalam kamera.

Sony relatively very new in the market…they (canon + nikon) already crusing at 250 km/h..meanwhile sony is just warming up their engine. As a camera enthusiasm …takkan kita nak tunggu sampai sony 5-10 tahun baru nak maju dan berdiri dan bersaing dgn canon serta nikon.

off coz during the period canon or nikon dah anticipate apa yg sony akan buat…so kedua mereka pasti akan bergerak lebih jauh meninggalkan sony.

so my view is that no doubt expensive nikon or canon ni, it is worth buying. Resale value pon ada. Function yang disediakan pon banyak.

so why must choose brand yang lagi 10 tahun nak maju rather than yang dah exist dalam market sekian lama. Emmmm tepuk dada tanya iman. Artikel yang dibaca adalah biase dan berat sebelah….kalau lah si penulis tu peminat canon sudah tentu dia akan cakap canon baguss…same goes to sony.

Honestly, simpan duit lama sikit…grab canon or nikon. Worth buying.

wasalam

khalas.

yg high end models tu, cam A900, D3X, 5DM3, cube2 lah try google cari mane lebih myerlah dalam pgunaan ISO yg tinggi..

so pendek kate, its up to user, its up to budget, setiap org lain feel-nye, lain cite rasa.. ^_^

sekarang pakai a300x jep..
=_=