why i LIKE SONY alpha.
Posted in Uncategorized on 10/11/2009 01:35 am by ienaGuys. Ini kenapa aku pilih SONY. Bukan sebab brand lain tak bagus. Tidak. So, ini copy PM dalam inbox aku daripada seorang forumer. Terbaik dari ladang.! Dia juga pesan kat aku untuk edit dulu kalau tak banyak spam kang. Haha but i think no need lah.
i choose to PM u, because i dont wan to trigger another sony vs nikon vs canon arguement on sony’s thread.
nikon using sony sensor!!! if they say sony bad, then nikon bad too. simple
those only know how to say sony is lousy but nikon are good but didnt know nikon is using sony sensor, are purely NOOB and they are well, FANBOYISH.brainless kids. i have PRO friend who uses nikon’s D3x (rm30,000… yes 30k) camera also said the sony’s A900 (rm9999) is much nicer to use compare to nikon’s, they uses the excately same sensor by sony.
canon are good, i’ll admit. but sony aint bad. summore, give sony a year or two, and sony R&D (research and development) with huge funding from SONY CORP (40 times bigger then canon), why wont sony surpass them?
1. sony has the best image stablizer! to date. they have it built in the body, which can stablize up to 5 stop (for the new alphas) but those canon and nikon stablizer built in lenses, only stablize up to 3 stop max. and u need to pay extra 500-900 for an IS/VR lenses type for canon/nikon, while sony’s lens, ALL will has super steady shot ready from Alpha body.
indirectly, they will tell u how cheap thier lenses is, infact when u look at IS/VR lenses for canon/nikon, they are more expensive then sony’s by almost a thousand! ask them, those canon/nikon user, they will later tell u, “no la, u wont buy those expensive lens, we use cheap lens.” and i wish them good luck with blurry images.Prime lenses(Best Sharpness lenses type) for canon/nikon, they Dont have VR/IS version. sony has Super Steady Shot. u’ll be surprised of the sharpness. if u are interested to know, pm me, i will mail u one shot of the prime lenses photo.
2. Live view. sony uses dedicate sensor for live view, thus it is Superfast. and by far, sony’s liveview is most advance among all DSLR!
canon/nikon live is LAGS like hell, u definately will MISS the shot.
even the simple point and shoot liveview focus system is faster then canon/nikon DSLR! thier liveview is a JOKE. ask them, they will tell u, PRO dont use LiveView. and if u ask sony users, they tell u, they get more nicer, difficult, special shot, thanks to liveview.
3. sony choose not to inculde HD recording because, HD technology is immature.
canon and nikon HD recording has no autofocus!, so u have to manual focus!, if u are not a profesional user, ur HD video will be out of focus 70% of the time! ur HD also more blur the dvd!4. sony provide new operating system in the camera, to help easy learning and fast learning for beginner. trust me, u will be ameatuar in 2 month, so is my gf!
5. sony camera color is not bad iether, even my gf, doesnt know art or camera, like picture taken by my sony compare to the friends i hang out with (canon and nikons), prehaps is thier skill problem.
6. sony has the cheapest “best flash/highest end” vs canon (rm1799) nikon (rm1999) sony, (rm1499… street price rm1200)… and flash is the next thing u going to buy after u buy ur camera. they also have the new release F20, which is a mini flash, which perform, of coz, better then the built in.
7. wait i go drink water first, later continue.
8. i was joking, i think 6 point above enough to convince u, u’ll be surprise more later how well a sony alpha can do for u.
9. btw, sony alpha is not new DSLR in the market, they have 80 years of history,… so is nikon and canon.
summore, a lot lenses from alpha’s predesessor (konica minolta) design were copycat by canon!
10. sony have lots of lengendary lenses. heard of beercan? mirror lenses? and STF?(soft transistion focus)? and we have CarlZiess, super sharp and clear lenses!
so itu lah sebabnya. eh ada lagi.
well, honestly, D90 is a good camera, and in fact, i loved that camera!! hehehe, but it is overpriced, mainly because of the brand Nikon (like Nike, branding value)… but i will tell u this, after 3 or 5 years, when sony hold 40% of DSLR market share, i believe they will have the same problem, branding value, making sony DSLR price goes up even higher then nikon!
and Sony is CRAZY< they come out with A550, just to kill D90 market, (A550 is far better then D90, and the best thing, it’s cheaper!) and the A850 fullframe, is cheaper then nikon’s D700 fullframe! OMG, the A850 will KILL the nikonD700 market… then u will see that nikon sale will drop so much that thier sharemarket price will drop, and maybe SONY will buy out Nikon! @.@ if u study world market and finance, u will see it too…
komen dan cadangan yang MEMBINA adalah diperlukan. Berikan pendapat anda juga. (Okay ini bukan pertandingan so tak ada hadiah untuk anda T_T) Kalau rasa menyampah sila tekan Alt+F4 tanpa ragu. Hehe [: Sekian.
October 11th, 2009 at 12:08 pm
Thanks for sharing the information.. read here also http://www.digitalreview.ca/content/Sony-Alpha-A350-Compared-to-Nikon-D80-pg1.shtml
October 13th, 2009 at 11:08 pm
i’ve read it before…that’s why i need ppl review…kalau website senang jep carik..
tapi tade pulak user brand lain nak jawab panjang lebar..mungkin sebab website dah banyak tolong jawab soalan2. lol
October 26th, 2009 at 2:24 pm
nice article!
October 26th, 2009 at 11:44 pm
WWOOOWW!! Saffa rasa macam dah terinfluence la plak dengan SONY ni! Saffa baru cadang nak angkut Nikon D3000 tahun depan bila ada duit..
Isk. Pening dah nak angkut mana. Anyway, Thanks! Saffa kena consider balik ah Sony Vs Nikon!
BTW, TShirt tu ada saiz XS, S n XL je yang tinggal.
October 29th, 2009 at 12:31 am
gune gear ape skg nie?
gear box? tak kotttt ???
October 29th, 2009 at 11:02 am
okey jep nikon…tapi kalau nak ambik d3000 jugak, saffa kena baca link ne,
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3000.htm#perf
October 29th, 2009 at 11:04 am
a’ah gear box…mana taw? haha…
sekarang pakai a300x jep..
=_=
November 1st, 2009 at 3:24 pm
Aku dulu pakai sony a300.. dan lepas dalam almost 2 years, aku tukar ke nikon D300.. aku tak rasa mane2 brand hebat, mane2 brand tak best.. its up to user.. aku suke sony nye SSS, the only brand yg ada body built in image stabilization.. tp ada beberape feature, function yg aku amat perlu tp takde dalam sony alpha (not even a700).. pandai2 lah korang google pbezaannye.. terus terang aku ckp, after using nikon, aku rasa lebih senang, walaupun tak se-user-friendly mcm sony, but function2 yg aku perlu mmg ada.. as a wedding photographer, aku tak perlukan live-view (mmg fun, tp tak digunakn dalam wedding (fast, nak kene always ready)..
yg high end models tu, cam A900, D3X, 5DM3, cube2 lah try google cari mane lebih myerlah dalam pgunaan ISO yg tinggi..
so pendek kate, its up to user, its up to budget, setiap org lain feel-nye, lain cite rasa.. ^_^
November 3rd, 2009 at 12:22 am
asalamualaikum wbt….
Actually dalam hal ini….no winners and losers. Baik sony atau apa ajek brand…terpulang mengikut keselesaan di pengguna tu. Keduanya, budget…kalau dah secupak manakan boleh jadi segantang.
Pun begitu, kenapa saya katakan kepada peminat yang mahu membeli dslr pergi lah survey canon or nikon…dan pada alasan yang sama mereka berdua ni adalah pioneer dalam kamera.
Sony relatively very new in the market…they (canon + nikon) already crusing at 250 km/h..meanwhile sony is just warming up their engine. As a camera enthusiasm …takkan kita nak tunggu sampai sony 5-10 tahun baru nak maju dan berdiri dan bersaing dgn canon serta nikon.
off coz during the period canon or nikon dah anticipate apa yg sony akan buat…so kedua mereka pasti akan bergerak lebih jauh meninggalkan sony.
so my view is that no doubt expensive nikon or canon ni, it is worth buying. Resale value pon ada. Function yang disediakan pon banyak.
so why must choose brand yang lagi 10 tahun nak maju rather than yang dah exist dalam market sekian lama. Emmmm tepuk dada tanya iman. Artikel yang dibaca adalah biase dan berat sebelah….kalau lah si penulis tu peminat canon sudah tentu dia akan cakap canon baguss…same goes to sony.
Honestly, simpan duit lama sikit…grab canon or nikon. Worth buying.
wasalam
khalas.
November 3rd, 2009 at 12:47 am
sony was the first who develop color sensor, btw, casio was the one first develop sensor, which is in black and white. so canon develop much later sensor. which, who is older? sony~~
dont say who is older in the market… maxis is younger then telekom and digi, yet they are now the richest and well 2nd biggest subcriber (after telekom and celcom merge)… maxis also the exclusive of iphone… maxis is young too but they are powerful.
cheers bro..
November 7th, 2009 at 7:25 pm
Iena,
im really sorry.. i am not camera enthusiast but i do mingle and lots of my friend are indeed professional photographer and some of them photograph for hobby purposes.
in this clash of the titans.. actually what we can say its.. how they used the technology and what best suits u.. if u bought a camera with thousand of features.. but you are young and new in this camera thingy.. it will not bring any difference.. study more.. learn more.. experience more.. then compare.. then only you will know which one best suits u.. its not in the matter of using the hightest and latest technology to get the best shot.. all you need is right time, right moment, right place with the right tools..
then you must think about your budget.. if u can only afford to buy something which around RM5k.. do talk about something that is in that range only.. dont talk about ferrari when you can only afford civic.. be realistic..
if you comparing about technology.. please.. again.. please.. do not use maxis as your example.. they are good in their business plan.. but sucks in their broadband.. again we r talking about technology here..
you like to use live view? or youre not? its all up to u.. at the end.. the best shot you can take will do the talking for you.. not the camera..
its like when u buy a computer.. will u use core2extreme or u just buy core2quad? well.. up to u.. ive been following this matter for quite some time.. if u really have the money.. please buy 1 high end sony.. 1 high end nikon and 1 high end canon.. then u do the comparison.. i would like to hear from you.. instead of listening to other ppl.. i do agree with some of the reply saying that the comments or review are much indeed bias.. because all mags in Malaysia and overseas get paid to do the review..
thank you..
cheers again..
November 12th, 2009 at 10:26 am
pressed ALT + F4 .. but y does my comment still appear?
owh.. n hey.. found u on lowyat forum bout the tun**ehem2
tried to pm u on ym in case that i might be able to help a bit
December 8th, 2009 at 12:35 pm
hye.
saye baru di sini.
but sangat berminat dalam dunia fotografi.
cadang nak beli SLR.
but bile da tgk2 camni.
da ta taw nak beli yg mane satu.
hmm.if bule can u send me some sample pic taken by ur sony.?
terima kasih banyak2
December 21st, 2009 at 12:39 am
betul tu cik sony… sy pun pengguna nikon (walaupun cuma d60) tapi sy rasa lebih selesa.. jangan cakap saya tak cuba brand lain.. saya sendiri masa nak beli suruh cina kedai tu letak depan sy sony, canon, nikon, olympus dan Panasonic LUMIX FZ18 (which is longfocus camera).. Tapi akhirnya lebih tertarik dengan nikon sebab feel dia lain..
Camera DSLR bukan bergantung pada technology canggih atau siapa dulu wujud.. IBM pun wujud dulu sebelum apple, tapi kenapa apple maju 10 tahun dari IBM sekarang? DSLR bukan hanya sebab technology, tapi cara awak sendiri ambil gambar dan resultnya..
Technology canggih mana pun tak menjamin apa-apa..kami pengguna nikon and canon percaya pada kepuasan bukan kemajuan semata.. hehe.. liveview untuk orang baru nak belajar ok lah.. tapi kalau dah lebih berjinak dalam dunia DSLR ni.. liveview tu tak pandang pun.. bukan nak berlagak.. tapi komen awak terlalu berat sebelah.. yup.. kita sokong apa kita pakai.. tapi.. kena cermin jugak diri..
Sony bagus.. macam penulis asal tu kata.. lagi 5-10 tahun akan dominasi 40-50% market DSLR dengan kemampuan 5-10 tu.. then nikon n canon still kat level tu jugak ke? saya rasa akan masih maju 10-20 tahun jugak. Hehe.. try comparekan sendiri.. jangan marah ye.. saya tak anti sony.. cuma rasa x best pulak entry n sangat berat sebelah..
kalau tak bagus, kenapa semua pro guna nikon + canon ye tak?
salam aman dr sy..
December 30th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
kalau tak bagus, kenapa semua pro sekarang jumping to alpha system?…
senang aje, google alpha, banyak pro guna alpha’s dah…
actually, doesnt matter what system u use, just love what u have. if u were to buy new camera… all the review will say:
nikon will say they have best lenses…(or they are the most expensive gear)
canon will tell u thier’s best iso (and any lens made before 1987 cant be use on new bodies, L lens are more expensive then CZ’s)
sony will say thier accessories are cheapest (yes it’s true to nikon and canon, and their AF CZ)
pentax will tell u their speed (or how they become a minor in the industry, slowly dying out)
olympus will say four third are the REAL format (while they say FF is rubbish, and APS-C is old school… sigh… kiddos)
hasselbald will laugh at the toys the above company is making, they tell u hasselbald is the REAL camera. (why nasa actually chosen hasselbald+carlzeiss for space photography)
why not try fujifilm? they have the most accurate color in photo… (but they are also the slowest body)
or kodak, or holga, or vivitar’s or leica?
blaahhh, just use nokia… 5MP, carlzeiss, dual xenon flash…